I've since heard that the Times is at a higher reading level, or maybe a lower one. Or, maybe reading levels are bogus.
I have no idea what reading level the Post is supposed to be at. I suspect it is slightly less snobby than the Times. Still, this line from a relatively complicated science article surprised me:
""If, through a process of melting, they collapse and are submerged in the sea, then we really are talking about sea-level rises of several meters." (A meter is about a yard.)"(Emphasis mine)
Oh. Really? Thanks. I missed that lesson. Are there really readers who need that reminder? The Post seems to think so.
0 Responses to 'The Washington Post Does Not Think You Are Smarter Than A Fifth Grader'