data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a5e6/7a5e61580487d8a3ae15ee1849fff8f1da99a6ee" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4894a/4894ab7d43db39f6a25cdbb77c8d56d5f2d4a102" alt=""
"I'm an English major, and the most liberating thing I've done is burn a copy of Charles Dicken's "A Tale of Two Cities""
First, I thought, wow. That book would burn for a while, and then my brain looped back and I realized we are talking about burning books. I understand that neither of these people did it out of a base hate, but it still scares me, still evokes Heinrich Heine's warning that is stencilled above photos of the Nazis burning books in whatever Holocaust museum visit: "When one burns books, one will soon burn people."
It took my years to realize it was OK not to finish a book if I found it boring. And even those books get to sit on my shelf. Surely, there are books that I find repulsive, whose ideas chill me, but I can't shake the belief that the cure for hurtful speech is more speech.
I think there is also an element of Judaism that is so deeply ingrained. It's not just the histories of book burning, it's the belief that text itself has value. That there is religious observance in studying it, that there should be real reverence paid to the ink on paper itself. While the actual religous rules apply only to specific texts, I am shaped by growing up in a house full of books--both Jewish and secular.
That is an interesting take on the clarinet page burning. I was going to say that I'm surprised you discussed book burning without mentioning "Fahrenheit 451", but I remembered book burning, or the concept and symbolism of, is bigger than that novel.